Packaging machinery safety and risk assessment

Plan a competent, project-specific safety review around the real machine, line, product and site.

Plan the application before selecting equipment

Packaging machinery safety cannot be confirmed from a generic product description. The assessment must consider intended use, foreseeable abnormal situations, materials, operator tasks, cleaning, changeover, fault recovery, maintenance, utilities and interaction with adjacent equipment.

The project should define responsibility for the supplied machine, combined assembly, site work, guarding interfaces, connections, validation of safety functions, instructions and training. Review the assessment when layout, controls, product, format or operating method changes.

Official UK guidance is the reference point for legal duties. The exact responsibilities depend on the project and should be confirmed by competent parties.

Packaging machinery safety and risk assessment

Information to prepare

  • Intended use, users and abnormal situations
  • Operating, cleaning, changeover and maintenance tasks
  • Product hazards and safety information
  • Machine and line boundaries
  • Access, guarding and isolation method
  • Utilities and stored-energy sources
  • Manual modes and fault recovery
  • Site procedures and competence

Review changes at the system boundary

Use the real product, pack and site conditions when completing the review.

Requirement areaWhat to confirmUseful evidence
Stand-alone machineAre access, guarding, controls, instructions and utilities suitable?Risk assessment, instructions and commissioning checks.
Machine added to a lineDo transfers or controls create new trapping, access or restart hazards?Combined layout, interface assessment and validation.
New feeder or conveyorCan stored energy, loading or clearing expose people to risk?Guarding and isolation review, safe method and training.
Product or format changeDoes the material introduce chemical, thermal, dust or handling hazards?Product information, change assessment and trial record.
Control or software changeCould sequence, speed, safety functions, alarms or restart be affected?Authorised change record and testing.
Guard or safety-component changeDoes the replacement preserve the required function?Competent design review and validation.

Important: This page is general information, not legal advice or a declaration of conformity. A competent, project-specific assessment and review of current UK requirements are necessary.

Define routine and non-routine tasks

Risk can increase during cleaning, changeover, clearing and maintenance. The specification and instructions should identify safe modes, isolation points, tools and authorised people.

Review the combined assembly

A safe stand-alone machine can create new hazards when connected to another machine. Gaps, transfers, shared guards, emergency-stop response and access between modules need assessment.

Use authoritative guidance

Refer to the UK Government machinery-safety guidance and HSE work equipment and machinery guidance.

Related planning routes

Buyer questions

Practical points to settle before machinery is selected

Does buying a marked machine remove the user’s duties?

No. The user still needs to ensure work equipment is suitable, installed, used and maintained safely in the workplace.

Who assesses a combined line?

Responsibilities depend on the supply and integration scope and should be agreed before design by competent parties.

Can a safety device be bypassed for setup?

Only where a designed and assessed setup mode provides the required protective measures. Improvised bypassing is not acceptable.

When should the risk assessment be reviewed?

When machinery, layout, controls, guarding, product, packaging or operating method changes, or evidence shows the assessment may no longer be adequate.

Prepare a machinery enquiry

Send the product, pack formats, current method, target result and site information so Lancing can review the most suitable next step.

Send project details