Products

Browse the updated category layout and machine groupings.

Machinery category selection

Build a packaging line from the right process stages

How to use the product catalogue

The catalogue is arranged by packaging operation rather than by a single machine type. This helps engineers and production teams compare the equipment needed before and after the main process. A filling project may also need bottle feeding, capping, labelling, coding, sealing and accumulation. A shrinkwrapping project may need an infeed conveyor, film handling, a heat tunnel and downstream packing space.

When reviewing pages, note the product type, container or pack format, closure, label or film material, cleaning requirement, operator access and the space available around the line. These details affect whether a compact semi-automatic machine, an automatic in-line machine or a complete integrated line is the better route.

For broad projects, start with the machine selector, then compare filling machinery, capping machinery, labelling machinery and conveyors and accumulation.

Useful enquiry details

Product samples, containers, closures, labels, pack drawings, utilities, space restrictions, changeover requirements and production targets help Lancing narrow the machinery selection.

Choose machinery by packaging task and process risk

A clearer route through the multi-category machinery catalogue

Begin with the operation that changes the product or pack

The most useful starting category is normally the operation with the greatest effect on product quality or pack integrity. For liquids, pastes, powders and granules, that is usually filling machinery. For bottles and jars that are already filled, the key decision may be the closure method within capping machinery. Packs that are closed but not presentation-ready may require labelling, sealing and packing or shrinkwrapping.

Feeding and movement should be reviewed at the same time rather than added after the principal machine has been selected. Container unscrambling, cap feeding, infeed control, conveyor speed, accumulation and outfeed handling determine whether each operation receives the pack consistently. The rinsing and feeding and conveyor and accumulation categories therefore form part of the specification even when they are not the main purchase.

Compare automation levels against the production method

A compact or semi-automatic machine can be appropriate where batches are short, formats change frequently or an operator is already needed for inspection and material handling. A more automatic system becomes useful when repetitive presentation, filling, closing or labelling constrains output or consistency. The right choice depends on the whole operating method: product replenishment, container loading, change parts, cleaning, fault recovery, quality checks and finished-pack removal all affect the labour requirement.

Catalogue pages are a starting point, not a substitute for application review. Before a machine is selected, Lancing needs to understand the product, pack, expected formats, site conditions and interface with existing equipment. Use the machine-selector journey to assemble that information and then review the relevant category pages in more detail.

Catalogue decision sequence

  1. Confirm the product-contact or pack-forming operation.
  2. Confirm the container, closure, label, film or outer pack.
  3. Define feeding, conveying, accumulation and reject handling.
  4. Set changeover, cleaning and operator-access requirements.
  5. Agree what a successful sample trial must demonstrate.

Find machinery by process, pack or production requirement

Use the catalogue with the new buyer-guidance clusters

The machinery categories remain the direct route when the required operation is known. For broader projects, use the pack-format application guides to connect bottles, jars, tubs, pouches, powders and granules to filling, closing, sealing and handling equipment.

Industry-specific requirements can change the selection even when the pack looks similar. The industry hub identifies product, cleaning, presentation and changeover questions for food and beverage, cosmetics, chemical and household products, and contract packing.

Before comparing individual models, the machinery specification guide and machine selector help define range, workflow, utilities, integration and acceptance evidence.

Choose the next route

  • Known operation: use a machinery category
  • Known pack: use an application guide
  • Known sector: use an industry guide
  • Unclear scope: use the machine selector
  • Multi-machine project: use integration guidance
  • Quotation ready: send samples and site details

Common questions about choosing packaging machinery

Use these answers to narrow the catalogue by process, product and pack rather than by appearance alone.

Which packaging machine category should be selected first?

Select the operation that creates the main technical constraint first. For example, a difficult product may dictate the filling method, an unusual closure may dictate capping, and an unstable container may dictate handling. The remaining machines should then be specified around that constraint and the required line sequence.

Use the process-led machine selector

What is the difference between inline and rotary packaging machinery?

Inline machinery moves packs through stations along a straight or curved conveyor, while rotary machinery indexes or moves packs around a turret. The better choice depends on output, pack stability, dwell time, changeover, access, footprint and the number of operations that must occur in a controlled position.

Compare inline and rotary systems

Can one machine handle several products and pack sizes?

One machine may handle several products and formats when the dosing principle, working range, guides, tooling, sensors and controls cover every combination. Suitability must be confirmed against a format matrix because the widest, tallest or most viscous item is not always the most difficult one.

Plan a multi-format changeover strategy

When is a complete line preferable to separate machines?

A complete line is preferable when interfaces, accumulation, controls, guarding and stop/restart behaviour are critical to the required output. Separate machines can be appropriate for staged investment, provided working heights, transfer zones and control signals are planned from the beginning.

Review complete-line options